Go home now Header Background Image
Search
Submission Procedure
share: |
 
Follow us
 
 
 
 
Volume 24 / Issue 9

available in:   PDF (476 kB) PS (9 MB)
 
get:  
Similar Docs BibTeX   Write a comment
  
get:  
Links into Future
 
DOI:   10.3217/jucs-024-09-1217

 

Target Selection in Head-Mounted Display Virtual Reality Environments

Difeng Yu (Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China)

Hai-Ning Liang (Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China)

Feiyu Lu (Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China)

Vijayakumar Nanjappan (Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China)

Konstantinos Papangelis (Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China)

Wei Wang (Xian Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China)

Abstract: Target selection is one of the most common and important tasks in interactive systems. Within virtual reality environments, target selection can pose extra challenges to users because targets can be located far away, clustered together, and occluded from view. Although selection techniques have been explored, it is often unclear which techniques perform better across different environmental target density levels and which have higher levels of usability especially for recently released commercial head-mounted display (HMD) virtual reality systems and input devices. In this paper, we first review previous studies on target selection in HMD VR environments. We then compare the performances of three main techniques or metaphors (RayCasting, Virtual Hand, and Hand-Extension) using recently marketed VR headsets and input devices under different density conditions and selection areas. After, we select the best two techniques (RayCasting and Virtual Hand) for the second experiment to explore their relative performance and usability by adding different feedback to these two techniques. In the third experiment, we implemented three techniques with pointing facilitators and compared them against the best techniques from the second experiment, RayCasting with visual feedback, to assess their performance, error rates, learning effects, and usability. The three studies altogether suggest the best target selection features, based on techniques, feedback, and pointing facilitators for target density conditions in HMD VR environments.

Keywords: 3D user interaction, HTC Vive, occlusion, oculus RIFT, target selection, virtual reality

Categories: B.4.2, D.0, J.4, L.3.1