Human Issues in Implementing eLearning Technology
J.UCS Special Issue
Armin Ulbrich (Know-Center, Graz, Austria)
aulbrich@know-center.at
Herbert Pacnik (Know-Center, Graz, Austria)
hpacnik@know-center.at
Abstract: Today, there is hardly any doubt that eLearning is
a powerful and valuable extension to traditional educational initiatives.
Thus, a fair amount of research and development (R&D) programs into
the ways to improving the impact of eLearning have been carried out and
are still ongoing. These programs traditionally focused on two different
views on eLearning: technological issues on the one hand and educational
issues on the other hand. This special issue on human issues in implementing
eLearning technology is an attempt to combine these different views, since
the most valuable results in eLearning will certainly be obtained when
researchers and developers from as many different professions as possible
come together and undertake joint efforts.
The contributions of this special issue deal especially with two topics,
which are considered equally important for a successful eLearning initiative:
the first is personalization regarding training and content and the second
is considering issues such as motivation, acceptance, resistances and fears,
or social requirements. Adapting content and training to the learner in
aspects such as prior knowledge, previous experiences, contexts, access
devices, needs or interests enhances the motivation to learn, makes the
learner feel involved, and thus supports knowledge acquisition. Accordingly,
the papers of this special issue are structured alongside the following
categories, which are aiming at covering a preferably large number of issues
that arise from viewing eLearning from the two distinct perspectives laid
out above:
- Methodology and Teaching Issues
- Technology Issues and Experiences gained
- Impact of eLearning on Education and Vice Versa
In the first category "Methodology and Teaching Issues"
issues concerning different learning techniques are considered (peer-based
learning, game-based learning) and the value of personality-aware teaching
methods are examined. In more detail, the following topics are addressed:
Heidrun Allert, Christoph Richter and Wolfgang Nejdl, all from the Learning
Lab Lower Saxony at the University of Hanover (Germany), describe in their
paper entitled Situated
Models and Metadata for Learning Management their approach on how
to provide meta-data that allows identifying personalized learning resources
in situated approaches, i.e. teaching approaches that deal with real world
problems, which are possibly ill-structured.
Special focus is set on how to consider social systems where human persons
serve as sources for knowledge transfer alongside other resources such
as technical services for communicating.
Maja Pivec and Olga Dziabenko from the FH Joanneum in Graz (Austria)
examine teaching approaches that focus on learning by experience rather
than on learning by studying. Learning by collaboration and game-based
learning are two cases that are studied in more detail. Finally the game
concept of UniGame, a game platform for community-based role play games
is introduced and laid out in detail. Their paper is called Game-
Based Learning in Universities and Lifelong Learning: "UniGame: Social
Skills and Knowledge Training" game concept.
Edmond Abrahamian from the St. Louis University (USA), Jerry Weinberg
from the Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville (USA) and Michael
Grady and C. Michael Stanton both from the St. Louis University (USA) examine
how user interfaces especially designed for certain personality types (using
the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) influence the performance of learners.
In their paper The Effect
of Personality-Aware Computer-Human Interfaces on Learning they
present a substantial number of quantitative and qualitative results from
their examinations and discuss consequences of their findings.
"Technology Issues and Experiences" presents software
architectures for the compilation of personalized learning programs and
the management of learner profiles and an experiences report from implementing
and applying collaborative learning in an organizational context.
Andreas Schmidt and Claudia Winterhalter from the FZI, Karlsruhe (Germany)
have entitled their contribution User
Context Aware Delivery of E-Learning Material: Approach and Architecture.
They present a general approach and architecture for a software system
that supports the contextualization of learning resources by means of modular
learning objects and applying semantic meta-data. They additionally describe
the process of gathering information concerning the learning person (learner
model) and how to find appropriate learning content by matching learner
models against learning resources.
Floriana Esposito, Oriana Licchelli and Giovanni Semeraro have entitled
their paper Discovering
Student Models in e-learning Systems. The paper deals with the
extraction and management of learners' profiles. They propose a system
called Profile Extractor where the mode of operation bases on Machine Learning
techniques and algorithms. By utilizing the Profile Extractor they argue
to be able to build up a personalized education environment. Finally they
show results from an evaluation of the accuracy of the Profile Extractor.
Thomas Flor from the DaimlerChrysler AG, Ulm (Germany) presents in his
paper, which he has entitled Experiences
with Adaptive User and Learning Models in eLearning Systems for Higher
Education, an approach that has been undertaken at DaimlerChrysler
to apply Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) to promote learning
effects.
He describes the requirements that had to be considered throughout the
process of implementing the given approach: from the original learning
processes that had to be identified and structured to several learning
scenarios that needed to be supported (cooperative learning, distance learning,
synchronous learning, etc.) and finally to styles and roles of user models
used to represent learners that had to be modeled. He concludes with an
evaluation of how the adaptive information system, which had been used
to realize the given approach, met the requirements that had been found
before.
"Impact of eLearning on Education and Vice Versa" deals
with the differences between traditional seminar-based teaching methods
and methods that are 'enhanced' by means of computer technology and with
cultural and social issues and how they need to be considered in developing
eLearning systems and eLearning content.
Maja Pivec and Konrad Baumann, both from the FH Joanneum, Graz (Austria),
have entitled their paper The
Role of Adaptation and Personalisation in Classroom-Based Learning and
in e-Learning. The paper compares adaptability, knowledge mediation
and knowledge flows in face-to-face classes to classes that utilize computer-based
systems. An overview of aspects on adaptation and personalisation issues
within these systems and some recent developments of intelligent tutors
capable of expressing emotions are presented.
Edith Denman-Maier from the Donau-Universität Krems (Austria) presents
in her paper Intercultural
Factors in Web-based Training Systems an examination of the impact
of intercultural issues on the production and presentation of eLearning
content. After a thorough discussion of empirical research and a data analysis,
hints and guidelines are presented for developing Web-based training modules
for culturally heterogeneous user group. She finally presents a number
of factors, which she believes cultural differences are discerned in. Edith
Denman-Maier's contribution concludes the special issue.
The variety of topics covered by the contributions of this special issue
hopefully provides readers with an overview of two important aspects of
applying eLearning to teaching methods: technological issues, in particular
how to provide learners with content and user interfaces that optimally
adapt to their needs and requirements, and considering motivation, acceptance,
resistances and fears, or social requirements when implementing an eLearning
strategy.
Graz, Austria
January 2004
Armin Ulbrich, Know-Center, Graz
Herbert Pacnik, Know-Center, Graz
|