Go home now Header Background Image
Search
Submission Procedure
share: |
 
Follow us
 
 
 
 
Volume 3 / Issue 9

available in:   HTML (29 kB) PDF (191 kB) PS (66 kB)
 
get:  
Similar Docs BibTeX   Write a comment
  
get:  
Links into Future
 
DOI:   10.3217/jucs-003-09-1074

 

Why We Need an Explicit Forum for Negative Results

Lutz Prechelt (Universit├Ąt Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract: Current Computer Science (CS) research is primarily focused on solving engineering problems. Often though, promising attempts for solving a particular problem fail for non-avoidable reasons. This is what I call a negative result: something that should have worked does not. Due to the current CS publication climate such negative results today are usually camouflaged as positive results by non-evaluating or mis-evaluating the research or by redefining the problem to fit the solution.

Such publication behavior hampers progress in CS by suppressing some valuable insights, producing spurious understanding, and misleading further research efforts. Specific examples given below illustrate and back up these claims.

This paper is the announcement of a (partial) remedy: a permanent publication forum explicitly for negative CS research results, called the Forum for Negative Results, FNR. FNR will be a regular part of J.UCS.

Keywords: FNR, failures, forum, negative results, progress., research culture

Categories: A.m, B.6.3, C.1.3, I.2.6, I.2.7, K.4.m, K.7.m